Location Image

205 Poe St. Richmond, VA 23222

Time Image

9AM - 5PM

Military or VA Medical Malpractice: What Documents Will My Attorney Need?

When starting a medical malpractice case, the injured patient should provide their attorney evidence both of what their injuries are and of how they were injured.  Documents from the military or VA can take awhile to receive, so you should request these as soon as you know you want to file a claim, so you can give to your military or VA medical malpractice attorney. 

The list below outlines the documents generally needed for medical malpractice cases:

  • Medical records from both military and civilian providers
  • Medical bills if tricare or VA has not paid for medical care
  • Death certificate and autopsy report if necessary
  • Correspondence with treating doctor 
  • Receipts for related out-of-pocket expenses 
  • Pay stubs or tax returns to show income loss from injury
  • Photographs  before and after the incident

 

Related Post

Military Medical MalpracticeMilitary Medical Malpractice

1. You can sue the military or government for medical malpractice.
Military dependents and active duty service members, may file a claim for medical malpractice when injured at a military treatment facility (in the U.S. or abroad).

2. You generally have only two (2) years to file a claim for military medical malpractice.
This generally applies to all cases. However, there are exceptions to the rule. The two-year time span can vary based on your case, so you will want to contact a medical malpractice attorney as soon as you know there has been negligence.

US Army doctor holding stethoscope near his shoulder – studio shot

When is Delayed Treatment VA or Military Medical Malpractice ?When is Delayed Treatment VA or Military Medical Malpractice ?

We have had many clients contact our firm when the VA or military has delayed treatment in some way. An example of this is when you go to the ER with breathing difficulties, and the ER doctor sends you home with an antibiotic, but a CT is warranted. Then you have to return the next day demanding a chest CT because your symptoms worsened. The VA most likely delayed treatment and breached the standard of care. The question becomes whether the delayed treatment caused the undesired end result like death or more severe damage to the lungs. This can get a little murky and make the case hard to win.

We had a case like the above, but the client had been treated for neck cancer 2 years prior to going to the ER, and the undesired end result stated that he died from cancer. We had to tell the client that even though the VA may have breached the standard of care by not treating the client with a CT, the VA did not cause the death from cancer. This is difficult news to tell clients especially when they have lost a loved one that received poor care from a medical facility.

The Necessity of Expert Testimony

In almost all cases, expert testimony is required to prove delayed treatment. A qualified expert in the particular medical discipline must give testimony as to how a reasonably competent doctor would have treated the patient properly and without delay. If it can be established by the patient (and his or her legal team) that the original doctor breached the standard of care, then a case for malpractice can be established. If, for example, it can be stated unequivocally that a reasonable doctor would have diagnosed the problem within 48 hours, but the defendant doctor neglected to recheck the patient for 2 weeks after the initial examination and did not run any other tests, he or she can be sued for malpractice.

Proving Harm Resulting from Negligence

Doctors, like everyone else, make mistakes. Patients trying to prove medical malpractice must prove that the doctor’s negligence has caused foreseeable harm, such as:

  • Pain and suffering
  • Medical bills
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Loss of capacity for enjoyment

It is not enough to show that the patient experienced any of these problems; it must be shown that the delayed treatment was responsible for the negative effects.

If you or a loved one has experienced a delay in obtaining a proper treatment and has suffered physical pain, emotional trauma, and/or financial loss as a result, you should contact Balkcom Law Firm, PLLC to discuss your options.

FTCA and MCA: Personal Injury Claims Against the Federal GovernmentFTCA and MCA: Personal Injury Claims Against the Federal Government

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and Military Claims Act (MCA) allows lawsuits to be filed against the federal government for injury occurring on federal governmental property or due to the negligence of a federal employee working in the scope of his or her employment. The feres doctrine prohibited such claims, but the FTCA and MCA allow limited exceptions like these.

Injury claims against any government agency involve special rules and limitations. Talk to an attorney before you miss any special deadlines!

What does the FTCA and MCA do?

The FTCA and MCA allows you to sue for personal injury caused by or on governmental property and its employees. However, recovery is more limited than state law claims. Federal law governs the procedure for FTCA lawsuits, but state law controls the substantive law, how a state will treat certain rights, duties, or obligations in the state where the injury occurred.

Car Accidents Caused by Federal Employees

If you are injured in a car accident caused by a federal employee during the scope of his or her job, the federal government may be sued under the FTCA. For example, if you are rear-ended by a U.S. Army truck, the federal government may be on the hook for your damages.

Premises Liability (Slip and Fall) Claims

Injury occurring on federal property caused by the negligence or neglect of the government, its tenants, or its employees can make the government responsible for the injury.

This does not mean that the plaintiff, the legal term for the injured party, does not need to prove that the government acted negligently and that because of that negligence he was injured. The of any other premises liability case remain intact. Again, under the FTCA and MCA, the government limits how much you can recover, so it is best to get an attorney to help you with your claim.

Time Limit to Sue

The statute of limitations for bringing a premises liability claim against the federal government is two years. This means that failing to file a lawsuit within this timeframe could lead to your case being dismissed.

Before a Lawsuit Can Be Filed

Prior to filing a lawsuit, a party must submit a claim to the agency directly in control of the employee or premises. Only after such claim is denied may the injured party then proceed to court. FTCA and MCA lawsuits are filed and presided over by federal court.

FTCA and MCA claims against the federal government are complex. If you have been injured while on government property seek legal assistance with your lawsuit. Contact Balkcom Law Firm for assistance!